|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Part 4. Process for Developing a Stormwater Management Program
Most traditional approaches to stormwater management focus on efficiently collecting and conveying stormwater off-site. Such an approach may increase downstream property damage and necessitates expensive public works, such as enlarging and reinforcing channels or swales to provide an adequate outfall from the site and/or downstream channel stabilization projects. More recent approaches to stormwater management seek to retain natural features of drainage systems by providing on-site stormwater quantity reduction that also improves stormwater quality. This approach views stormwater as a resource that can be used to
The objective of the Phase II program is for Phase II municipalities to develop effective, site-specific stormwater management programs that reduce the discharge of pollutants from MS4s to the MEP. EPA has chosen this flexible regulatory approach because the nature of discharges from MS4s varies from region to region. You, as the operator of a small MS4, should consider incorporating the following elements into your stormwater management program:
Governmental Coordination Intragovernmental coordination of the municipal agencies and departments having purview over stormwater-related issues is fundamental to a successful stormwater management program. You should consider designating a "lead agency" within your municipality to facilitate the coordination of the various stormwater pollution control activities. Intergovernmental coordination is also important, especially when a number of small MS4s are partnering together to implement the minimum measures. Legal Authority and Comprehensive PlanningMunicipalities can use the legal authority of new and existing programs and ordinances, zoning rules, and the site plan review process to ensure that water quality concerns are addressed in new development and redevelopment. Municipalities should consider developing a comprehensive plan that incorporates both location-specific and watershed-wide goals. Also, both long- and short-term planning should be conducted to prevent or mitigate the impacts of cumulative loadings throughout the watershed. Assessing the impacts of cumulative loadings using indicators, trend data, and other means is an essential part of this process. Many jurisdictions have ongoing programs and activities that are related, to some degree, to stormwater quality. Existing programs, state and local codes, and local ordinances should be reviewed to determine if requirements should be revised or strengthened. When no program or ordinance exists to address a specific stormwater issue, one should be developed. Examples include programs that address flooding, combined sewer overflows, infiltration and inflow (a contributor to sanitary sewer overflows), and erosion and sediment control. You should consider how these programs could be linked, expanded, or otherwise augmented to achieve additional stormwater quality enhancement and other measurable environmental benefits. Because development almost always increases impervious surfaces (a good measure of land use intensity), recent development will, in most cases, lead to increased discharges of pollutants from MS4s. Urbanization causes fundamental modifications to the hydrological cycle, typically resulting in an increase in the volume of stormwater discharges and associated pollutant loadings. Chemical, physical, and thermal changes associated with new development can adversely affect receiving waters.It is important to integrate stormwater management program elements with your community's land development process, including redevelopment. Therefore, you should have a working knowledge of the role that the site plan review and land use planning processed play in your municipality. The site plan review process is typically the final stage of municipal review that occurs before development takes place. Water-related codes and ordinances, such as erosion and sediment controls, stormwater management, and prevention and removal of illicit connections, should be implemented through the site planning process and verified through the review process. Site plan review is often the only regulatory process of this type that a land developer must go through if the land use is compatible with the zoning for that land (or if there is no zoning). Land use planning is an additional process that precedes (but does not replace) the site plan review process. The planning process typically involves the setting of land use goals and objectives for various parts of a municipality into a plan document or onto a plan map. These plans are usually termed Comprehensive Land Use Plans, Master Plans, or Comprehensive Zoning Plans. In many instances, land has already been zoned for a certain category of land use. Such categorization may have resulted in a zoning category being designated based on the existing land use at the time the zoning process commenced, which in most areas occurred in the early part of the Twentieth Century.In contrast, planning has generally evolved over the past 50 years, and in many cases far more recently than that. Where the planned land use (e.g., planned zoning category) is different than the existing zoning, a land developer may desire to have the zoning category changed to the planned category. This process is referred to as rezoning and can be one of the most important decision-making functions of local government officials. It is also the process by which some municipalities have required public facility improvements and other infrastructure improvements from land developers through the development process. Stormwater controls may be implemented by developers wishing to rezone (and develop) property. For example, specific planned land use designations are usually identified on a parcel-specific basis as a zoning category. These categories may be limited to only one possible land use or may provide for a range of land use opportunities that often depend on a series of policy-based criteria. A common example of this is a higher range of residential density available to a developer that provides low- or moderately priced housing units as part of the development. Just as these types of land use decisions must be made early in the development process, so should provisions for stormwater quality management planning.Regulated small Phase II MS4s will vary greatly in their stages of land use planning because of different state laws and regional requirements. If you have recently updated your land use plan, there is a good chance that water quality issues will have been incorporated into the process. In other instances, there may be no mention of a policy (or more specific criteria) to include water quality in guiding land use decisions. Still other municipalities may not even have comprehensive land use planning. You should consider incorporation of policies regarding stormwater quality your land use (planning and zoning) process by developing or strengthening ordinances. In summary, you should rely on existing land development requirements, consider strengthening or developing new stormwater codes and ordinances, and use the site plan review process to ensure that appropriate stormwater codes and ordinances are implemented. Funding and StaffingThe development and implementation of an effective stormwater management program ultimately depends on adequate resources being made available for personnel and equipment. Therefore, your program should identify the resources that your municipality is committing to implement each program component. You should clearly establish program position descriptions and funding sources for administrative and field personnel to implement the program. You should try to identify the projected funding needs and sources accurately to allow the longest possible lead time for arranging program financing. You should also provide a schedule indicating changes in staffing and equipment if you propose phased implementation. Public Education and ParticipationYou should be sure to provide adequate public education and ample opportunities for public participation in all aspects of your program. The goals of the education and public involvement program must be defined under the proposed stormwater management program. Generally, the public should be involved as early as possible when considering major technical and policy issues of the development and implementation phases of the management program. Program element milestones should be included for public participation, particularly in the program development phase. In some cases the public involvement may simply be to receive information. Public participation can also be used to focus on education and awareness of major technical and policy issues in the implementation phase. If time is available, conflict and confusion can often be minimized if the public involvement and education program includes a schedule for initial public contact and education and milestones for involvement throughout the development and implementation phase. Public education programs are expected to target specific audiences, including those regulated or affected by the program, such as developers, building contractors, and industrial operators, and those that can assist with program implementation (e.g., volunteers and citizens). BMP SelectionYou should propose a municipal stormwater management program that address activities and schedules for implementation of each of the 6 minimum measures identified in the regulations. Your emphasis should be on program components that reflect site-specific characteristics of the municipality (e.g., population density, land use and age of communities, soil type, and topography), the municipal storm sewer system, and the receiving waters. Implementation priorities can be set to target the sources of specific pollution problems from certain land uses or target the problems resulting from the land use activities of a specific geographic area. It is important that you identify schedule for implementing various program components as part of the program itself so that expectations about the impact that the management program will be realistic. Continued support for any program will depend on meeting scheduled milestones and attaining results. Questions that should be considered when developing priorities include:
Structural controls include infiltration devices, detention and retention basins, vegetated swales, water quality inlets, screens and filters, channel stabilization, riparian habitat enhancement efforts, and wetland restoration projects. You should be aware that CWA Section 404 permits might be required for certain types of structural controls (i.e., projects that discharge dredged or fill materials to waters of the United States, including wetlands). Also, some projects might require State permits that address water quality and quantity issues. You are encouraged use appropriate guidelines and performance standards for identifying and implementing specific structural controls for the construction site and post-construction minimum measures. Your program should describe the criteria to be used to establish that a particular structural control is warranted and the circumstances under which the control will be required. New structural controls and proposed retrofits should be discussed separately because the opportunities for control selection are often quite different.You should conduct an evaluation of major existing structural controls and municipally owned sites and rights-of-way where new controls can be installed. An inventory will allow you to develop a better picture of the capacity to reduce pollutants to the MEP of current and potential stormwater quality and quantity controls and will facilitate both long- and short-term stormwater master planning. EPA recommends that you also follow a set of pre-established priorities for selecting, siting, and installing structural controls and implementing source control measures during the development process. EPA and the Center for Watershed Protection provided guidance in the form of a “Manual Builder” for this purpose. This tool is available on the Stormwater Manager’s Resource Center
The following nonstructural practices should be considered when land is limited or unavailable:
Proper maintenance plays a vital role in ensuring the proper operation of both structural and source controls. For example, reducing the frequency of inspections and cleanout of a structure may initially reduce program costs, but the effectiveness of the BMP can be diminished, which creates the need for additional controls and results in a deterioration in water quality, which has a cost associated with it. In addition, the perception that a given stormwater control BMP does not work (even though the reason is lack of maintenance) can be very damaging to a fledgling program as it seeks to establish its support base. The section of your stormwater management program that describes your management practices should include a description of the maintenance activities and a maintenance schedule for structural controls. Oftentimes the effectiveness of structural stormwater controls, especially detention and retention basins and infiltration devices, is limited by lack of maintenance. Other structures that require regular maintenance are catch basins and drainage channels. You can develop a schedule of regular maintenance of structural controls and infrastructure (e.g., removing sediment from retention ponds every five years, cleaning catch basins annually, removal of litter from channels twice a year) as part of your stormwater management program. You can use maintenance logs to track activities and develop a matrix of tasks, such as inspection, repair, replacement, and cleanout, on a timeline. GANT charts or other critical path analyses are readily available and are recommended as ways that you can organize a maintenance program and schedule.In some cases, regularly scheduled maintenance might not be appropriate; rather, periodic inspections can be used to determine when maintenance is needed. If maintenance is to be based on the results of inspections or if maintenance is scheduled infrequently, you should provide an inspection schedule and identify the municipal department(s) responsible for the maintenance program. Because maintenance issues are critical to successful program implementation, measurable goals for maintenance should be considered throughout the term of the permit. Stormwater Management Program ImplementationThe following information was taken, in part, from Stormwater Phase II Workshops sponsored by the American Public Works Association (APWA) in 2001 and from APWA's manual Designing and Implementing an Effective Stormwater Management Program (AWPA, 2000). This guidance is intended to assist Phase II cities with understanding, organizing, and developing their stormwater management program in compliance with the Phase II requirements. Two major steps are necessary: a self analysis to help the Phase II city collect information and assess information, and an action plan to form goals and set a schedule for development of a Phase II stormwater management plan. Self AnalysisYou should conduct a comprehensive self analysis to help you gain a better understanding of your current situation with respect to complying with the Stormwater Phase II Rule. The self analysis should consist, at a minimum, of the following components:
Your next step will be to develop an action plan to help you determine what to do and when. An action plan is a tool to help guide you as you develop your stormwater management program, and is not required under the EPA regulations. The first step in developing an action plan is to complete the self analysis previously described.
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
|
|