NEW APPROACHES IN THE DERIVATION OF ACCEPTABLE DAILY INTAKE (ADI)

Notice - This site contains archived material(s)

Archive disclaimer
Archive disclaimer
Archived files are provided for reference purposes only. These files are no longer maintained by the Agency and may be outdated. For current EPA information, go to www.epa.gov. It is EPA's policy to support reasonable accommodation to persons with disabilities, pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 791. If you need assistance with accessing archived files, contact EPA's Reasonable Accommodations or submit a request using the Contact Us form.


Abstract

Current methods for estimating human health risks from exposure to threshold-acting toxicants in water or food, such as those established by the U.S. EPA, the FDA, the NAS, the WHO and the FAO, consider only chronic or lifetime exposure to individual chemicals. These methods generally estimate a single, constant daily intake rate which is low enough to be considered safe or acceptable. his intake rate is termed the acceptable daily intake (ADI). wo problems with this approach have been recognized. he first problem is that this method does not readily account for the number of animals used to determine the appropriate "no-observed-effect level" (NOEL). he second problem with the current approach is that the slope of the dose-response curve of the critical toxic effect is generally ignored in estimating the ADI. he purpose of this text is to illustrate both a revised approach to estimate ADIs with all toxicity data which includes methods for partial lifetime assessment, and novel methods for ADI estimation with quantal or continuous toxicity data. he latter method addresses to a degree the common problems with the current approach.

Citation

Dourson, M. NEW APPROACHES IN THE DERIVATION OF ACCEPTABLE DAILY INTAKE (ADI). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., EPA/600/J-86/554 (NTIS PB91191379), 1986.

Additional Information

Comments Toxicology 1(1):35-48, 1986