Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Safer and Effective Solvents for Paint Stripping

EPA Grant Number: SU836780
Title: Safer and Effective Solvents for Paint Stripping
Investigators: Morose, Gregory
Institution: University of Massachusetts - Lowell
EPA Project Officer: Page, Angela
Phase: I
Project Period: September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2017
Project Amount: $14,840
RFA: P3 Awards: A National Student Design Competition for Sustainability Focusing on People, Prosperity and the Planet (2016) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Sustainable and Healthy Communities , P3 Awards , P3 Challenge Area - Chemical Safety

Description:

Identify and evaluate alternatives to methylene chloride that have equal or better paint stripping performance and do not introduce any significant environmental, health, and safety hazards.

Objective:

Methylene chloride is a widely used component for paint stripping products.  Methylene chloride is highly volatile and the primary route of exposure is inhalation. There have been numerous occupational and consumer deaths during paint stripping operations resulting from acute methylene chloride poisoning. Further, methylene chloride is classified as a human carcinogen. Consequently, there is increasing demand for paint stripping products that do not contain methylene chloride. Several commercially available products do not contain methylene chloride, however, their paint stripping performance is significantly below that of methylene chloride, and the replacement chemicals, such as N-Methyl-2- Pyrrolidone (NMP), introduce other environmental, health, and safety hazards. The objective of this research is to identify and evaluate alternatives to methylene chloride that have equal or better paint stripping performance and do not introduce any significant environmental, health, and safety hazards.

Approach:

In Phase I of this project, the multidisciplinary team will first identify solvent blends that have comparable or better solvency characteristics than methylene chloride for various paint coatings. The team will use the Hansen Solubility Parameters in Practice software tool to identify solvent blends with the desired solvency parameters (diffusion, polarity, and hydrogen bonding). The new solvent blends identified will then be evaluated for environmental, health, and safety issues, as well as commercial availability and cost. The solvent blends will then undergo technical performance testing for paint stripping efficacy on various substrates and coatings at the Toxics Use Reduction Institute Laboratory. The final validation testing of the solvent blends will then take place at Belcastro Furniture Restoration.

Expected Results:

The identification and initial evaluation of solvent blends with equal or better paint stripping performance, comparable ingredient costs, and a safer environmental, health, and safety profile as compared to methylene chloride.

Publications and Presentations:

Publications have been submitted on this project: View all 5 publications for this project

Supplemental Keywords:

Green Chemistry, Paint Stripping, Methylene chloride, Toxics use reduction, N-Methyl-2- Pyrrolidone, Environmental Health, Alternatives assessment, Formulations, Hansen Solubility Parameters;

Progress and Final Reports:

  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report
    5 publications for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.