Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Use of Population Genetics in Cost/Benefit Analysis of Habitat Restoration and Landscape Development

EPA Grant Number: U915938
Title: Use of Population Genetics in Cost/Benefit Analysis of Habitat Restoration and Landscape Development
Investigators: Bruggeman, Douglas J.
Institution: Michigan State University
EPA Project Officer: Packard, Benjamin H
Project Period: January 1, 2001 through January 1, 2004
Project Amount: $101,915
RFA: STAR Graduate Fellowships (2001) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Academic Fellowships , Environmental Justice , Fellowship - Environmental

Objective:

The objective of this research project is to derive methods for integrating population genetic endpoints with Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA) to develop a multidisciplinary decision tool. HEA is a scaling methodology used to determine the spatial, temporal, and financial requirements to provide an optimal level of "ecological service flows" in restored or enhanced habitats. The integration of population genetics and HEA will provide a construct for planning, prioritizing, and assessing ecological restoration based on the genetic viability of populations in the restored habitats. The objective of habitat restoration is to provide adequate resources to sustain natural populations. Therefore, effective restoration plans must address the interacting processes that affect the genetic structure in the species of interest (i.e., natural selection, genetic drift, mutation, gene flow, and reproduction). Habitat restoration efforts that do not effectively provide niche requirements and migration corridors for viable populations will fail. Incorporating predictions of spatial genetic structure into HEA will facilitate a cost/benefit analysis of various parcels considered for acquisition and restoration. Potential applications of this multidisciplinary decision tool include threatened and endangered species management, germplasm conservation, and green space design for Smart Growth.

Approach:

To integrate population genetic models with HEA, the initial effort will be placed in theoretical justification and modeling. The initial model may be constructed using a simulated habitat mosaic disrupted by varying levels of human development. Geographical genetic models that describe the correlation of genetic structure based on distance (i.e., the stepping stone approach) will be used to predict the gene frequencies over various parcels considered for restoration. Differential migration and recruitment among parcels will provide kernels for this model. Extensions of the space-time autoregressive moving average (STARMA) genetic drift models may be useful for this application. As the STARMA model progresses through time, shared and unshared stochastic effects of genetic drift on gene frequencies of neutral loci in neighboring subpopulations may be estimated for the different parcels. Furthermore, statistical uses of STARMA models with empirical data for gene frequencies can be used to estimate migration rates, strength of selection, and effective population size. Therefore, STARMA models provide a useful platform for theoretical development and empirical validation of ecological interactions.

Supplemental Keywords:

fellowship, population genetic endpoints, Habitat Equivalency Analysis, HEA, population genetics, habitat restoration, landscape development, cost/benefit analysis.

Progress and Final Reports:

  • 2001
  • 2002
  • Final
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.