Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

2017 Progress Report: NCCLC: Network for Rapid Assessment of Chemical Life Cycle Impact

EPA Grant Number: R835579
Title: NCCLC: Network for Rapid Assessment of Chemical Life Cycle Impact
Investigators: Suh, Sangwon , Keller, Arturo A. , Doherty, Michael , Seshadri, Ram , Scott, Susannah
Current Investigators: Suh, Sangwon , Keller, Arturo A. , Scott, Susannah , Seshadri, Ram , Doherty, Michael
Institution: University of California - Santa Barbara
EPA Project Officer: Aja, Hayley
Project Period: December 1, 2013 through November 30, 2017 (Extended to November 30, 2019)
Project Period Covered by this Report: December 1, 2016 through November 30,2017
Project Amount: $4,887,644
RFA: EPA/NSF Networks for Characterizing Chemical Life Cycle (NCCLCs) (2013) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Chemical Safety for Sustainability

Objective:

The Network for Rapid Assessment of Chemical Life Cycle Impact of UCSB, which is internally referred to as the Chemical Life Cycle Collaborative (CLiCC) is developing a framework to enable early assessment of the life cycle impacts of novel chemicals and materials. The framework can also be used to fill-in data gaps in the prediction of life cycle impacts for existing chemicals with large data gaps.

Progress Summary:

To date, the CLiCC team has 1) developed a Predictive Life Cycle Impact Assessment Module to estimate the impact of chemicals across cumulative energy demand, aquatic eco-toxicity, eco-indicator, ozone layer depletion, acidification and water demand; 2) developed a Life Cycle Inventory Module that recursively models chemical manufacturing processes to estimate heat and energy requirement for synthesizing a chemical product. 3) Finalized the underlying Life Cycle Inventory database containing substantial amount of chemical manufacturing information; 4) conducted preliminary sensitivity analyses for the Life Cycle Inventory module 5) created a module that connects chemical functional uses and product applications together to generate realistic estimates of releases; 6) developed two fate and transport modules to predict the dynamic long term fate of organic chemicals and nanomaterials in the natural environment; 7) validated the organic chemical fate and transport model against the Level III standard; 8) completed regional data, allowing users to make reports for specific locations, for 12 local regions and one global region; 8) completed three human exposure modules for outdoor exposure, indoor air exposure, and dermal exposure scenarios; 9) collected and integrated an extensive database of experimental toxicity data; 10) built internal capabilities for three QSAR property modeling tools; 11) developed a module that accommodates in a consistent way the different sources of uncertainty and allows a coherent uncertainty and sensitivity characterization across all Risk Assessment modules in CLiCC; 12) completed case studies for Sustainable Apparel Coalition, Ecolab, and Sherwin-Williams, incorporating Predictive Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Toxicity, Fate & Transport, and Exposure Assessment as integral components of the CLiCC Tool; 13) continuously performed various outreach activities such as webinars introducing CLiCC, summer workshops for graduate students and professionals, stakeholder meetings and surveys, etc; 14) validated fate and transport module outputs with real-world emissions and measurements of pesticides in the environment; 15) optimized CLiCC modules for running on the backend of the online CLiCC Tool to minimize runtime for users; 16) Programmed an extensive Application Programming Interface (API) allowing CLiCC’s back-end modules to connect with the front-end of the online CLiCC Tool; 17) Contracted and collaborated with professional software engineers and web developers who have created and ensured the security of a beta version of the online CLiCC Tool; and 18) Written detailed draft Technical User Guides for the Exposure and the Fate and Transport modules.

The team's extensive fate and transport, life cycle inventory, and life cycle impact estimation modules have been embedded into a beta version of user-friendly public online tool. The tool allows multiple levels of analysis, for both the layperson and the advanced user to benefit from. Workshops and scholarly achievements in terms of papers and presentations are summarized below with the detailed list in the accompanied progress report.

Future Activities:

First, we will finalize the life cycle inventory module methodology, continue to curate and integrate additional external databases for experimental toxicity values, and expand the uncertainty characterization to applicable sections of all modules. Second, we will compare and analyze the outputs of our modules to those from other similar models developed by other researchers. Eventually an outside expert/organization will be employed to evaluate the validity of out modules.Third, we will continue to improve the CLiCC Tool by designing and performing a robust round of user testing that adheres to industry best practices. This feedback will be used to refine the usability and functionality of the CLiCC Tool. Tutorial content and videos will be developed to aid inexperienced users, and detailed guides for users will be refined to make the CLiCC Tool more transparent.Fourth, we will promote the CLiCC Tool to the widest potential audience possible. We will continue to host training sessions with other organizations, distribute promotion materials at professional events, hold special sessions highlighting the CLiCC Tool at international conferences, etc.


Journal Articles on this Report : 15 Displayed | Download in RIS Format

Publications Views
Other project views: All 34 publications 24 publications in selected types All 24 journal articles
Publications
Type Citation Project Document Sources
Journal Article Bergesen JD, Suh S. A framework for technological learning in the supply chain: a case study on CdTe photovoltaics. Applied Energy 2016;169:721-728. R835579 (2015)
R835579 (2016)
R835579 (2017)
R835579 (2018)
  • Full-text: Kundoc-Full Text HTML and PDF
    Exit
  • Abstract: ScienceDirect-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: EconPapers-Abstract
    Exit
  • Journal Article Cucurachi S, Suh S. A moonshot for sustainability assessment. Environmental Science & Technology 2015;49(16):9497-9498. R835579 (2016)
    R835579 (2017)
    R835579 (2018)
  • Full-text: ACS-Full Text-HTML
    Exit
  • Abstract: ACS-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: ACS-Full Text-PDF
    Exit
  • Journal Article Cucurachi S, Suh S. Cause-effect analysis for sustainable development policy. Environmental Reviews 2017;25(3):358-379. R835579 (2016)
    R835579 (2017)
    R835579 (2018)
  • Abstract: Environmental Reviews-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: ResearchGate-Abstract
    Exit
  • Journal Article Fabin D. Quantifying the potential for lead pollution from halide perovskite photovoltaics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2015;6(18):3546-3548. R835579 (2016)
    R835579 (2017)
    R835579 (2018)
  • Abstract from PubMed
  • Full-text: ACS-Full Text HTML
    Exit
  • Abstract: ACS-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: ACS-Full Text PDF
    Exit
  • Journal Article Garner KL, Suh S, Lenihan HS, Keller AA. Species sensitivity distributions for engineered nanomaterials. Environmental Science & Technology 2015;49(9):5753-5759. R835579 (2015)
    R835579 (2016)
    R835579 (2017)
    R835579 (2018)
  • Abstract from PubMed
  • Full-text: ACS-Full Text HTML
    Exit
  • Abstract: ACS-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: ACS-Full Text PDF
    Exit
  • Journal Article Garner KL, Suh S, Keller AA. Assessing the risk of engineered nanomaterials in the environment: development and application of the nanoFate model. Environmental Science & Technology 2017;51(10):5541-5551. R835579 (2015)
    R835579 (2016)
    R835579 (2017)
    R835579 (2018)
  • Abstract from PubMed
  • Full-text: UCSB-Full Text PDF
    Exit
  • Abstract: ACS-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: ACS-Full Text PDF
    Exit
  • Journal Article Ghadbeigi L, Harada JK, Lettiere BR, Sparks TD. Performance and resource considerations of Li-ion battery electrode materials. Energy & Environmental Science 2015;8(6):1640-1650. R835579 (2015)
    R835579 (2016)
    R835579 (2017)
    R835579 (2018)
  • Full-text: RSC-Author Version Full Text PDF
    Exit
  • Abstract: RSC-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: University of Utah-Abstract
    Exit
  • Journal Article Katelhon A, Bardow A, Suh S. Stochastic technology choice model for Consequential Life Cycle Assessment. Environmental Science & Technology 2016;50(23):12575-12583. R835579 (2015)
    R835579 (2016)
    R835579 (2017)
    R835579 (2018)
  • Abstract from PubMed
  • Full-text: ACS-Full Text HTML
    Exit
  • Abstract: ACS-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: ACS-Full Text PDF
    Exit
  • Journal Article Katelhon A, von der Assen N, Suh S, Jung J, Bardow A. Industry-cost-curve approach for modeling the environmental impact of introducing new technologies in life cycle assessment. Environmental Science & Technology 2015;49(13):7543-7551. R835579 (2016)
    R835579 (2017)
    R835579 (2018)
  • Abstract from PubMed
  • Full-text: ACS-Full Text HTML
    Exit
  • Abstract: ACS-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: ACS-Full Text PDF
    Exit
  • Journal Article Qin Y, Suh S. What distribution function do life cycle inventories follow? The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2017;22(7):1138-1145. R835579 (2016)
    R835579 (2017)
    R835579 (2018)
  • Full-text: ResearchGate-Abstract and Full Text-PDF
    Exit
  • Abstract: Springer-Abstract
    Exit
  • Journal Article Song R, Qin Y, Suh S, Keller AA. Dynamic model for the stocks and release flows of engineered nanomaterials. Environmental Science & Technology 2017;51(21):12424-12433. R835579 (2016)
    R835579 (2017)
    R835579 (2018)
    R835800 (Final)
  • Full-text from PubMed
  • Full-text: UC Santa Barbara-Full Text HTML
    Exit
  • Abstract: ACS-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: UC Santa Barbara-Full Text PDF
    Exit
  • Journal Article Song R, Keller AA, Suh S. Rapid life-cycle impact screening using artificial neural networks. Environmental Science & Technology 2017;51(18):10777-10785. R835579 (2016)
    R835579 (2017)
    R835579 (2018)
  • Abstract from PubMed
  • Full-text: UC Santa Barbara-Full Text HTML
    Exit
  • Abstract: ACS-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: UC Santa Barbara-Full Text PDF
    Exit
  • Journal Article Suh S, Qin Y. Pre-calculated LCIs with uncertainties revisited. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2017;22(5):827-831. R835579 (2015)
    R835579 (2016)
    R835579 (2017)
    R835579 (2018)
  • Abstract: Springer-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: ResearchGate-Abstract
    Exit
  • Journal Article Tsang MP, Li D, Garner KL, Keller AA, Suh S, Sonnemann GW. Modeling human health characterization factors for indoor nanomaterial emissions in life cycle assessment: a case-study of titanium dioxide. Environmental Science: Nano 2017;4(8):1705-1721. R835579 (2016)
    R835579 (2017)
    R835579 (2018)
  • Full-text: ResearchGate-Abstract and Full Text-PDF
    Exit
  • Abstract: RSC-Abstract
    Exit
  • Journal Article Yang Y, Suh S. Changes in environmental impacts of major crops in the US. Environmental Research Letters 2015;10(9):094016. R835579 (2016)
    R835579 (2017)
    R835579 (2018)
  • Full-text: IOP Science-Full Text HTML
    Exit
  • Abstract: IOP Science-Abstract
    Exit
  • Other: IOP Science-Full Text PDF
    Exit
  • Relevant Websites:

    The CLiCC Tool is now live in beta Exit

    We have built a website to showcase our progress and achievements Exit

    Progress and Final Reports:

    Original Abstract
  • 2014 Progress Report
  • 2015 Progress Report
  • 2016 Progress Report
  • 2018 Progress Report
  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report
    • 2018 Progress Report
    • 2016 Progress Report
    • 2015 Progress Report
    • 2014 Progress Report
    • Original Abstract
    34 publications for this project
    24 journal articles for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.